Last Friday I had the privilege of presenting at the Finance, Investment & Innovation Delegation Roundtable hosted by the Auckland Business Chamber — a small, focused gathering bringing together senior representatives from Shaanxi Province with a select group of New Zealand businesses.
The delegation was led by senior government and financial figures — including the Deputy Director-General of the Office of the Financial Commission of the CPC Shaanxi Provincial Committee, the Director-General of the Provincial Treasury Payment Center, and the Chairmen of Qin Nong Bank and Yong'an Property Insurance, among others. It was exactly the kind of room where a practical, frank conversation about investment frameworks is most valuable.
I presented alongside Michelle Chen from Moore Markhams and Tammy Crause from Fox Partnerships, with each of us covering our respective areas. My focus was the Overseas Investment Office — the OIO — and the rules governing how overseas investors can acquire property in New Zealand. Given the seniority of the group and their background in finance and institutional investment, I wanted to keep it practical and grounded in real examples.
If you are not a New Zealand citizen, the OIO rules may apply when you look to acquire property here. The rules vary significantly depending on what type of property you are acquiring — and understanding which category you fall into is the essential first step.
I walked the delegation through three asset classes: residential property, commercial property, and sensitive land. Each has a distinct set of requirements.
This is where the most important recent change sits. Overseas persons were previously prohibited from acquiring residential land in New Zealand. That restriction now has a meaningful exception: investors who hold a resident visa under the Active Investor Plus (AIP) category — New Zealand's Golden Visa — can purchase residential property here.
The property must be valued at a minimum of NZD 5 million, calculated on land and construction costs — fit-out is excluded from that figure. It is a detail that matters, and one worth getting right from the outset.
For developers, there are two separate exemption pathways: the Build-to-Rent exemption — which requires the developer to hold and rent long-term — and the increased housing supply exemption, which requires the developer to on-sell the completed units. The two are often confused, but the conditions are quite different.
Below the NZD 100 million threshold, commercial property does not require OIO consent. The market is open. For the vast majority of commercial transactions — hotels, offices, retail, industrial assets — Chinese investors can participate directly and without the OIO process. We have acted on a number of landmark commercial acquisitions in Auckland on exactly this basis.
Sensitive land — which includes rural land of five hectares or more, farmland, foreshore, and seabed — requires OIO consent and a benefit-to-New Zealand assessment. The OIO applies a counterfactual test: would New Zealand be better off with this investor than without them? It is not a closed door, but it requires a carefully constructed case. Structure and narrative matter enormously.
China has been a core part of our practice at Queen City Law for many years. The investors we work with are serious, long-term participants in the New Zealand economy — and collectively, our AIP clients have invested over one billion dollars into this country. Property has always been central to those conversations.
It was a genuine privilege to be part of this roundtable, and I am grateful to the Auckland Business Chamber — particularly Anna-May Isbey and Hao Hsu — for the invitation and the quality of the event. The delegation asked sharp questions and the dialogue was substantive. I hope it marks the beginning of a longer conversation. If you are a Chinese investor or institution considering New Zealand and would like to understand the investment framework, I would be happy to talk.